Vincent Browne's lament for lost sovereignty - invoking Rousseau in the process, who was born three hundred years old this week - adorns this morning's Irish Times. It's an aspirational piece, without resolution and reactionary. The language of what he would see as European neo-imperialism is versed in words like sovereignty and democracy, and this requires an examination of those principles. The article is to be lauded for that. But let's look at some of the themes - "freedom", the "arbitrariness of market forces", and the "common good".
First, on the notion of freedom, and man being born "free". There is no such thing as absolute freedom. Thomas Hobbes, a predecessor of Rousseau, argued famously on the state of nature that mankind was in before political order took hold. The life of a man in that state of nature was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short," Hobbes wrote in his magnum opus, Leviathan. Man is born dependent on mother, then family, then society. His existence is relative, and social.
First, on the notion of freedom, and man being born "free". There is no such thing as absolute freedom. Thomas Hobbes, a predecessor of Rousseau, argued famously on the state of nature that mankind was in before political order took hold. The life of a man in that state of nature was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short," Hobbes wrote in his magnum opus, Leviathan. Man is born dependent on mother, then family, then society. His existence is relative, and social.